Math is Figure-Out-Able with Pam Harris

#MathStratChat - July 26, 2023

July 26, 2023 Pam Harris
#MathStratChat - July 26, 2023
Math is Figure-Out-Able with Pam Harris
More Info
Math is Figure-Out-Able with Pam Harris
#MathStratChat - July 26, 2023
Jul 26, 2023
Pam Harris

In today’s MathStratChat, Pam and Kim discuss the MathStratChat problem shared on social media on July 26, 2023. 



Note: It’s more fun if you try to solve the problem, share it on social media, comment on others strategies, before you listen to Pam and Kim’s strategies.



Check out #MathStratChat on your favorite social media site and join in the conversation.

Twitter: @PWHarris

Instagram: Pam Harris_math

Facebook: Pam Harris, author, mathematics education



Want more? Check out the archive of all of our #MathStratChat posts!




Show Notes Transcript

In today’s MathStratChat, Pam and Kim discuss the MathStratChat problem shared on social media on July 26, 2023. 



Note: It’s more fun if you try to solve the problem, share it on social media, comment on others strategies, before you listen to Pam and Kim’s strategies.



Check out #MathStratChat on your favorite social media site and join in the conversation.

Twitter: @PWHarris

Instagram: Pam Harris_math

Facebook: Pam Harris, author, mathematics education



Want more? Check out the archive of all of our #MathStratChat posts!




Pam  00:01

Hey, fellow mathematicians! Welcome to the podcast where Math is Figure-Out-Able! I'm Pam.

 

Kim  00:07

And I'm Kim.

 

Pam  00:08

And this episode is a MathStratChat episode.

 

Kim  00:11

Hey, what's MathStratChat? Every Wednesday, Pam throws out a problem on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, and people from all around the world chat about the strategies they use. It's super fun to see everyone's thinking,

 

Pam  00:23

Alright, this Wednesday, our math problem was 144 subtract 48. 144 minus 48. How would you solve this problem? Pause the podcast, solve the problem any way you want, the problem is 144 subtract 48. Solve it, and then come back to hear how we solved it. Alright.

 

Kim  00:44

I'm going to go first. 

 

Pam  00:45

Okay, you're up, Kim. Go, go, go.

 

Kim  00:46

I'm feeling it.

 

Pam  00:47

You're stealing the thing I usually say... 

 

Kim  00:49

I am.

 

Pam  00:49

...and now you're going first. All the things. 

 

Kim  00:51

Okay.

 

Pam  00:51

Alright.

 

Kim  00:52

So, 144 minus 48. I'm just going to subtract 44 to get to a friendly number, get to 100. And then, I just have 4 more to take away. So, I'm calling it 96.

 

Pam  01:05

Bam! Nice strategy. And it makes a lot of sense for these numbers. Totally cool. 

 

Kim  01:09

Yep. 

 

Pam  01:09

There's also something kind of fun, when I designed this problem, to think about which is 144 is a bunch of 12s. I think a lot of people might recognize that it's a bunch of 12s. And I think it's twelve 12s. So, 144 is twelve 12s. Well, 48 is nicely a bunch of 12s as well. It's four 12s. So, if I have nine 12s, subtract four...

 

Kim  01:31

Wait, wait, wait. Twelve 12s.

 

Pam  01:32

Excuse me. I looked at your... I don't even know what I looked at. Twelve 12s, subtract four 12s is eight 12s. 

 

Kim  01:38

Yeah. 

 

Pam  01:39

And then, darn it all, if that's one that I just have to actually think about eight 12s. I usually have to think and say, it's somewhere in the 90s, so 96. I just have to think about that just a little bit.

 

Kim  01:49

Cooper would love your strategy because he's obsessed with 12s. 

 

Pam  01:52

Oh, nice, nice.

 

Kim  01:52

Like, he knows a ton of 12s. So, yeah, he would like that one. Nicely done.

 

Pam  01:57

So, while we're at it, though, f I could just kind of play a little bit. When I look at 144, I see 12, so those pop. But now that I know there's 12s and I know there's twelve 12s, I could also see six 24s. Like, if there's twelve 12s, then there's going to be half as many things that are twice as big. So, twelve 12s or six 24s because in 48, there's two 24s. So, now I have six 24s, subtract two 24s. Is that four 24s?

 

Kim  02:25

Mmhmm.

 

Pam  02:26

And then, I could also think about four 24s as being 96. So, just kind of another thing to play with. And if (unclear)

 

Kim  02:32

Go the other way.

 

Pam  02:34

Oh, go the other way.

 

Kim  02:35

Yeah, yeah. Like, you went from 12 to 6. What about like 24s?

 

Pam  02:40

Well, then I would have twenty-four 6s. Like, I had six 24s. The other direction would be twenty-four 6s. Is that right?

 

Kim  02:47

Mmhmm.

 

Pam  02:48

I was actually going to go to 4s. 

 

Kim  02:50

Okay.

 

Pam  02:51

I don't know why, though. Like, if I go to 4s, then I would have... I have to think for a second. I'm actually going for the 6 times 24. I'm thinking about it as 24 times 6. And if I'm going to go to 4s, 24 divided by 6 is 4. So, 6 times 4 is 24, and I end up with 4... Wait, that's not right. What did I do wrong? 24 divided by... Oh. No? Yeah. 6 times 6 is 36. I did two different factors. So, then, I could end up with 4 times 36. And I could choose to play with that one or not. Yeah, kind of fun.

 

Kim  03:27

Super fun to play around though.

 

Pam  03:29

Yeah. Wait. 

 

Kim  03:30

Cool. 

 

Pam  03:30

I think I did something wrong. 4 times 36. Is that equivalent to 96? No. What did I do wrong? 24 times 6. Is that correct? Yes. So, if I divide 24 by 6, I get 4. And if I multiply 6 by 4... By 6, I get 36. 4 times 36. How come 4 times 36 feels a whole lot bigger than 24 times 6?

 

Kim  04:02

I don't know.

 

Pam  04:03

Well, am I right?

 

Kim  04:05

I just started writing down what you were saying. 24 times 6. I was just listening to you. 24 times 6.

 

Pam  04:12

Oh, I know what I'm doing wrong. I'm a dork. I'm forgetting to subtract off the extra.

 

Kim  04:19

For?

 

Pam  04:19

I've been messing around with the 12 times 12, but I wasn't subtracting the 48. I couldn't figure out why was I getting more than 96? Wow. Okay, Kim, we're done for the day. I'm not doing any more math today. Alright, ya'll, we can't wait to see your math strategy. Was that fun to hear my brain kind of like freak out? Oh, for heaven's sakes.

 

Kim  04:36

Hey, it's real. 

 

Pam  04:37

So, I found a lot of ways to think about 144, and then couldn't figure out why they weren't equivalent to 96. And I was forgetting to subtract the 48 from the original problem. For heaven's sakes, I wonder if your strategy was like Kim's. Not mine! It was probably something completely different. What were you going to say? No?

 

Kim  04:54

Oh, I was going to say represent your thinking people. Take picture of your work and share it with us. We like to see what you're thinking and so does everybody else, so comment on their work too.

 

Pam  05:06

Unless it was like mine today. Ya'll, tag me on Twitter at @PWHarris. Or Instagram, PamHarris_math. Or Facebook, Pam Harris, author, mathematics education. And when you do, use the hashtag MathStratChat, then we can find it easier. And check out the next MathStratChat problem that we'll post somewhere around 7pm Central time on Wednesday, and then hop back here to hear how we're thinking about the problem. Ya'll, thanks for joining us as part of the Math is Figure-Out-Able movement. Help us keep spreading the word that Math is Figure-Out-Able!