June 11, 2024
Pam Harris
Episode 208

Ep 208: Fraction Multiplication Part 3

Math is Figure-Out-Able with Pam Harris

More Info
Share

Math is Figure-Out-Able with Pam Harris

Ep 208: Fraction Multiplication Part 3

Jun 11, 2024
Episode 208

Pam Harris

What does it look like when students confidently and efficiently reason through fraction multiplication problems? In this episode Pam and Kim discuss more sophisticated and efficient strategies for solving fraction multiplication problems.

Talking Points:

- How to model the commutative property in fraction multiplication.
- How to reasoning through "slash and burn".
- In a classroom, we would expect for students to have a variety of strategies to solve a rich problem.
- It's not about multiple representations but about connections between multiple representations so that kids have a series of connections in their head.

Help us reach 1 million downloads! Share the podcast with a friend!

Check out our social media

Twitter: @PWHarris

Instagram: Pam Harris_math

Facebook: Pam Harris, author, mathematics education

Linkedin: Pam Harris Consulting LLC

Listen on

Share Episode

What does it look like when students confidently and efficiently reason through fraction multiplication problems? In this episode Pam and Kim discuss more sophisticated and efficient strategies for solving fraction multiplication problems.

Talking Points:

- How to model the commutative property in fraction multiplication.
- How to reasoning through "slash and burn".
- In a classroom, we would expect for students to have a variety of strategies to solve a rich problem.
- It's not about multiple representations but about connections between multiple representations so that kids have a series of connections in their head.

Help us reach 1 million downloads! Share the podcast with a friend!

Check out our social media

Twitter: @PWHarris

Instagram: Pam Harris_math

Facebook: Pam Harris, author, mathematics education

Linkedin: Pam Harris Consulting LLC

**Pam **00:00

Hey, fellow mathers! Welcome to the podcast where Math is Figure-Out-Able I'm Pam Harris, a former mimicker turned Mather.

**Kim **00:09

And I'm Kim Montague, a reasoner, who now knows how to share her thinking with others. At Math is Figure-Out-Able, we are on a mission to improve math teaching.

**Pam **00:17

We know that algorithms are amazing historic achievements, but they are not good teaching tools because mimicking step-by-step procedures can actually trap students into using less sophisticated reasoning than the problems are intended to develop.

**Kim **00:32

In this podcast, we help you teach mathing, building relationships with your students, and grappling with mathematical relationships.

**Pam **00:39

We invite you to join us to make math more Figure-Out-Able!l Alright, that's getting down. I'm getting that down. That sentence is so long.

**Kim **00:47

Well, you said that. You can do something about it.

**Pam **00:50

No, but it's such a good one. Like, I've had several people tell me that they really like it.

**Kim **00:53

Yeah.

**Pam **00:54

I just take a deep breath, and... It's like my days of playing the trombone. It's like...

**Kim **01:01

You played the trombone?

**Pam **01:02

I did. Do you want to know why? Because I wanted to be... She's like, "No," but I'm going to tell you anyway. I wanted to be in the band. And I told my parents, I wanted to play the drums. I was like, all over. My dad played the drums. I was like, "I want to play the drums." They were like, "Okay, you could be in the band." And my dad came home one day, and he had this beat up old trombone. And he goes, "Hey, check it out. I got an instrument for you." And I was like, "I'm sorry, what? I want to play the drums." And he's like, "Yeah, but I was able to get this free trombone." I was like, "Um..."

**Kim **01:29

That is not the drums.

**Pam **01:31

So not. They said, "Play it for a year, and then you can play the drums and whatever." Anyway, I played it for like four years. It was fine.

**Kim **01:38

That's amazing. How do I not know? It's always fun when after 20, what, 2 years (unclear). Okay.

**Pam **01:43

The good part about playing the trombone is I was the only girl always.

**Kim **01:47

Yeah, of course.

**Pam **01:47

It was like me and the guys. It was awesome.

**Kim **01:48

I shouldn't say "Of course." Lots of trombone players are women (unclear).

**Pam **01:51

I'm sure there are, but not in mine, and it was great. The ratio was in my favor. I had a blast being a girl (unclear). Alright, Kim, let's do math. (unclear).

**Kim **02:02

But first.

**Pam **02:03

Oh, okay, okay.

**Kim **02:03

We have this lovely, lovely woman named Kim.

**Pam **02:06

Oh.

**Kim **02:06

Hi, Kim.

**Pam **02:07

We like people named Kim.

**Kim **02:08

Kim Bright. She left us a review. It's been a while now. And I've been saving it because...

**Pam **02:14

It was that good?

**Kim **02:15

Well, it's fun. She says, "My favorite math podcast."

**Pam **02:19

Aww, thanks.

**Kim **02:20

"I love listening to Pam and Kim share different ways to think about teaching math. I've gained so much math from them..." Sorry, "I've gained so much from them and implement a ton of what they're sharing into my teaching practice. They're fun to listen to, and break down math in real fun and practical ways. Thank you for sending the message that the use of reasoning and understanding of numeracy is the way to understand math. I'm here for it, and so are my students."

**Pam **02:45

Aww, that's awesome

**Kim **02:46

We're here for it too, Kim. Thanks.

**Pam **02:48

Thanks for the five stars, Kim.

**Kim **02:49

Yeah.

**Pam **02:50

And, listeners, thank you so much for giving us reviews, and... What do you call that? The rating, right? Rating? Rating reviews. The algorithms for podcast, the more ratings and reviews we get, then the more listeners can find the podcast, and the more we can help revolutionize the way we teach math, so we appreciate you guys helping us get the word out.

**Kim **03:09

Okay, so the last couple of weeks, we've been talking about fractions, fraction multiplication, and we did an episode on unit fractions and unit fraction by a unit fraction. And then last week, we talked about taking that understanding and using scaling to think about non-unit fraction multiplication.

**Pam **03:28

Yes.

**Kim **03:28

So, today, let's go some more.

**Pam **03:31

Yeah. So if you have not listened to those, we are really not going to recap a lot of that. So, we're going to build off of it, so you might want to listen. I mean, you're welcome to listen to today. But as soon as you hit something you're like, "What?" then it might be because maybe we're building off of... We are. Not maybe. But yeah, check out the last two if you haven't heard them yet. Alright, cool. So, Kim, I'm going to throw out a question, and I just want to hear your thinking. Don't try to give me what you think I want. Just tell me actually how you think about it.

**Kim **03:59

Okay. Do I ever?

**Pam **04:02

I mean, pretty much. So, Kim, if I were to say two-fifths times three-fourths. Two-fifths times three-fourths? What do you?

**Kim **04:09

Yeah. So, I think I mentioned this last week that when I think about a fraction times fraction multiplication, then I think about... I'm actually going to write down what I think in my head. So, I actually think 2 times one-fifth times 3 times one-fourth. So, I think about the fifth and the fourth as the twentieth. But then I scale up, like we talked about last week, times 2, and then scale that up again, times 3. And so, for that, I get six-twentieths.

**Pam **04:41

Cool. And then you would probably also think about simplifying that six-twentieths just...

**Kim **04:47

I mean, if I had to. Somebody (unclear).

**Pam **04:48

If you have to.

**Kim **04:49

Yeah.

**Pam **04:49

But you wouldn't have to. You can think about that as six-twentieths.

**Kim **04:52

Yeah.

**Pam **04:52

Cool. So, that would definitely be a way that you could think about that. If you weren't thinking about the last two weeks. I wonder if there's any other way you might think about two-fifths times three-fourths.

**Kim **05:02

Do I get to play?

**Pam **05:03

Yeah, you get to play. Play a little bit.

**Kim **05:06

Okay, so if I was thinking about two-fifths times three-fourths, then I would actually think about three-fifths times two-fourths. And that would be half of three-fifths.

**Pam **05:17

Because two-fourths is one-half.

**Kim **05:19

Yeah.

**Pam **05:20

Okay.

**Kim **05:20

So, half of three-fifths is three-tenths.

**Pam **05:25

How do you know half of three-fifths is three-tenths?

**Kim **05:28

Because I think about one-fifth, and I think about half of that. Half of one-fifth is one-tenth, so half of three-fifths is three-tenths.

**Pam **05:39

Nice. Nice. Nice. Nice. Any percents coming to mind just while we're playing a little?

**Kim **05:47

Well, yeah. I mean, I think 50% of three-fifths. You could also think about 40% of 75. Or 75% of 40. Like, (unclear).

**Pam **05:58

(unclear) Yeah, if you go back to the original problem, two-fifths times three-fourths, you're saying you could think two-fifths is 40%?

**Kim **06:05

Even more fun would be 75% of 0.4.

**Pam **06:11

Slow that down just a little bit.

**Kim **06:12

Okay.

**Pam **06:12

Because the problem is two-fifths times three-fourths. But you're thinking you can think about three-fourths times two-fifths...

**Kim **06:18

Yes.

**Pam **06:19

...as 75% of two-fifths, which is 0.4.

**Kim **06:24

Yeah.

**Pam **06:24

Why would you think about 75% of 0.4? I love it. I love it. I love it.

**Kim **06:31

Because 75% of...

**Pam **06:36

Like, how do I verbalize this? Three-fourths? How about

**Both Pam and Kim **06:39

three-fourths of 40

**Kim **06:40

cents is $0.30.

**Pam **06:42

$0.30. Bam. And there's your three-tenths again?

**Kim **06:44

Yeah.

**Pam **06:44

Yeah.

**Kim **06:44

This would be a great MathStratChat problem once you do a lot of work with your kids (unclear) so many fun things on this problem. I love this problem.

**Pam **06:52

So many things you could do with it. Yeah.

**Kim **06:54

Yeah.

**Pam **06:54

Cool. Okay, so now that we've established that two-fifths times three-fourths is six-twentieths or three-tenths. Which is equivalent to three-tenths. Another way that we can also model that would be kind of based on a little bit about what you said earlier. I'm going to draw a candy bar, and so I've got a rectangle kind of a horizontally. A little bit longer rectangle. And I'm going to think about two-fifths of three-fourths by thinking about a fifth of a fourth first. So, I'm thinking about fourths. I'm going to cut the whole candy bar vertically into fourths. And then I'm going to cut the whole candy bar horizontally into fifths. Okay, so now I've got sort of a 5 by 4 to represent fifths by fourths. And if I think about a fifth of a fourth, that's kind of that upper left hand rectangle, but we need to two 1/5s, so I double that, so now I've got two of those fifths in that left hand column. And then we need three 1/4s, so I'm going to triple that across. And so, my rectangle now looks like kind of a 5 by 4. Do I hear your pencil? I think I hear your pencil.

**Kim **08:06

Sorry.

**Pam **08:07

No, that's awesome.

**Kim **08:08

I'm sketching your picture.

**Pam **08:09

You pencil person, you. And then... So, where did I even say? I've got like a 5 by 4 where I've got the 2... How do I say this? A 2 by 3 shaded in. In the middle of it. Does that track for you?

**Kim **08:24

Yeah, so your big rectangle, your outside big is a 5 by 4.

**Pam **08:28

Mmhm.

**Kim **08:29

And then inside of that you have a 2 by 3 shaded.

**Pam **08:32

Yes, yes.

**Kim **08:33

Okay, cool.

**Pam **08:33

And so, that's kind of those six-twentieths. And like we talked about last time, I could count each of them. I could look at those 6 as three 2 chunkers, and that would be three 2 chunkers out of the ten 2 chunkers. That would be another way to see the three-tenths. But we're not going to go there today. So, focusing on the six-twentieths, I've got sort of 6 out of the 20 shaded. Okay, cool. Next problem. What is three-fifths times two-fourths? And I think you even did that when I asked you to think about the other one

**Kim **09:05

(unclear) You let me play with (unclear).

**Pam **09:06

I did let you play. What is three-fifths to two-fourths? Say it again.

**Kim **09:11

That is also six-twentieths or three-tenths.

**Pam **09:15

And that's because you thought about two-fourths as one-half. And that's when you did the whole half of 3. Yeah, anyway. So, okay, so you're saying they have the same answer, right?

**Kim **09:24

I do. Mmhm. (unclear).

**Pam **09:25

Okay, so three-tenths or six-twentieths. But I'm going to go ahead and represent a rectangle, that is three-fifths by two-fourths. Okay. So, underneath my other, the rectangle for the first problem, I'm drawing the same rectangle. But this time, I'm going... So, like the outside is the same. But now I'm going to draw... I can think here. I'm going to still do fourths vertically and still do fifths horizontally. That takes me a second. Okay. And now I'm going to do 3... So, I've got a fourth of a fifth is that top left hand rectangle, and I've got 3... I'm going to scale that times 3. That little guy times 3. So, now it's down there times 3. So, in that left hand column, I've got 3 rectangles shaded in. But now it's two-fourths, so I'm going to double that. And so, now my rectangle looks like a 5 by 4, but the inner shaded rectangle is a 3 by 2. Does that track?

**Kim **10:33

Yep.

**Pam **10:33

Okay. So, if I was doing this with real kids because you're not a real kid.

**Kim **10:38

Sometimes.

**Pam **10:39

Then I would have the problem two-fifths times three-fourths, with the one rectangle, and the problem three-fifths times two-fourths with the other rectangle that we've just described. And then I would step back, and I would say, "What do you see?" So, Kim, if you were a kid, or yourself, what are some things you might see?

**Kim **11:00

So, in the first problem... I have numbers all over the place. I think the first problem was two-fifths times three-fourths.

**Pam **11:07

Mmhm.

**Kim **11:08

Okay. So, in in the original first problem, I still am thinking about fifth time's fourths. But I only had two of the 1/5s, and I had three of the 1/4s.

**Pam **11:20

Mmhm.

**Kim **11:21

But this time, I'm still thinking about fifth time's fourths, but I have three of the 1/5s and two of the 1/4s. So, you can see that in the representation that you sketched because the 2 and the 3 are reversed, their swapped, and it looks like a rotation in your model.

**Pam **11:44

The shaded part, right? Because the outside rectangle looks the same. It's still a 5 by 4. And the inside shaded guy went from a 2 by 3, rotate to a 3 by 2. But like you said, both of them are thinking about a fifth times a fourth, and then scaling either times 2 times 3 or in the second one times 3 times 2. So, we end up with 6 shaded pieces out of the 20 shaded pieces. It's just they're sort of rotated a little bit. And that can be a spatial way to help kids sort of think about the commutative property in fraction multiplication. That they can literally reason through a problem like two-fifths times three-fourths. But they could also say to themselves, "Yeah, but I could swap. I could rotate that inner array." Thank you, Cathy Fosnot, by the way. So, I learned this rotating the inner away from Cathy Fosnot. I probably should have mentioned at the beginning, maybe. So, golly is that in Parks and Playgrounds? So she has a (unclear).

**Kim **12:46

Yeah.

**Pam **12:46

I think it's called Parks and Playgrounds. Measuring Parks and Playgrounds? Something about parks and playgrounds, where it's this idea that you can look at the shaded inner array, and you can watch it rotate, and that kids can go, "Oh, yeah, multiplication is commutative." So, I think there's two things happening here. One, we have a spatial justification for the idea that the numerators can kind of switch places or that you can use the commutative property. But also there's kind of, Kim, you're scaling idea going on. When you talked about two-fifths times three-fourths, you said that you were thinking about that as two 1/5s times three 1/4s. And so, once you can kind of think about that one-fifth times one-fourth. You know like, the way I have it written down on my paper is 2 "parentheses" 1/5 times 3 "parentheses" 1/4. I can use the commutative property right there.

**Kim **13:36

Yep.

**Pam **13:36

And think about one-fifth times one-fourth. That's the one-twentieth. And I think about that 2 times 3 as the 6.

**Kim **13:42

Yeah.

**Pam **13:43

So, what that means is, we can have other problems where once we realize that we can make those fractions into the numerator times that unit fraction, and the other numerator times its unit fraction, then we can kind of go wild with the commutative property, and out comes this idea of simplifying either first or at the end because, really, we kind of use the commutative property to do it. So, for example, I could give you a problem like two-fifths times five-sixths, and you could, at that point, decide... Well, let me back up. The way that I've seen a lot of teachers handle this is they go "Okay, either multiply straight across." Now, kids are rote memorizing a rule and they're mimicking.

**Kim **14:37

Yep.

**Pam **14:37

And then they have to remember which rule to do when.

**Kim **14:39

Yep.

**Pam **14:39

Or the teacher says, "No, no, no. We're going to get some modeling out of this," and so they say, "Draw a rectangle. Cut one one side into fifths, shade 2 of them. Cut the other side into sixths, shade 5 of them. Count the double shaded pieces. Count the total. And then represent the shaded pieces out of the total." We're submitting that that's another procedure that kids are rote memorizing and mimicking. And then they're stuck in counting strategies because they're counting what's coming out of it. So, we're not recommending either of those when a kid hits two-fifths times five-sixths, but we're also not recommending that teachers start to slash and burn at this point.

**Kim **15:21

Mmhm.

**Pam **15:21

Where they're like, "Okay, so I can see two-fifths and five-sixths. Hey, those fives are the same. I'm just going to like cross them out (unclear)."

**Kim **15:27

The same.

**Pam **15:28

Yeah.

**Kim **15:29

The same.

**Pam **15:31

And so, now we've got this sort of slash and burn thing happening, and they're cross canceling or whatever. All these things that then kids start to cross cancel no matter what is happening in between the fractions.

**Kim **15:42

Right.

**Pam **15:43

So, we're also not suggesting that that is the first go to. How could kids look at a problem like two-fifths times five-sixth and use reasoning to go from there? Kim, I'm not going to say much more than that.

**Kim **15:57

Yeah.

**Pam **15:57

What are you thinking about?

**Kim **15:58

So, I thought two-fifths means 2 times one-fifth. And I wrote two times one-fifth. And then I also wrote times 5 times one-sixth. So, on my paper, I have 2 times one-fifth times 5 times one-sixth. That's what that fraction multiplication means. So, within that, I have one-fifth times 5. Which means like it's equivalent to 1.

**Pam **16:25

And we would want kids to know that, right?

**Kim **16:27

Right.

**Pam **16:28

Like, that's not a, "Ooh, look, there's a 5 in the numerator and a 5 in the denominator. We can slash and burn them." No, we like want to actually think about what five 1/5s means.

**Kim **16:37

Yeah.

**Pam **16:38

That's an important understanding.

**Kim **16:40

Yeah.

**Pam **16:40

Five 1/5s. Cool. (unclear).

**Kim **16:42

So, then I have 2 times one-sixth (unclear).

**Pam **16:44

Leftover.

**Kim **16:45

Yeah. Two-sixth is a third.

**Pam **16:48

And two- sixths is equivalent to one-third. Cool. And how are you thinking about two-sixths being equivalent to one-third? And I know you're probably not thinking about that very much, but if you think about it?

**Kim **17:04

I don't know.

**Pam **17:05

You've got that one pretty ingrained, right?

**Kim **17:07

I mean, yeah, yeah.

**Pam **17:08

Yeah. I wonder if you were to think about your two 1/6s. Does that... I don't know. Does that do anything?

**Kim **17:19

I mean, if I thought something was, you know, cut into 6 pieces, and I had 2 of them, then it would be equivalent to if I had that same thing cut into thirds.

**Pam **17:27

Yeah.

**Kim **17:28

Yeah.

**Pam **17:29

That's one way to think of it, sure. Yeah, nice. So, Kim.

**Kim **17:35

Yeah?

**Pam **17:35

We actually want kids to think about fraction problems, where it's not just slashing and burning, but they're actually thinking about unit fractions, the numerator times unit fractions, scaling times unit fractions, so that they can make sense of the fact that they're using the commutative property, and that they're going to end up with things like 5 times one-fifth and 2 times one-sixth, and that they can make sense of what those things mean.

**Kim **18:01

Yeah.

**Pam **18:02

Instead of just mimicking an area model. Go ahead.

**Kim **18:04

Yeah. Well, and I was going to say when you give kids the opportunities to have some real understanding, that is one way that they can think about that problem. But there's several other ways. And I think that's what we're looking for in a classroom, right? We wouldn't want an environment where every single kid in the classroom does what I just said to solve two-fifth time's five-sixths because it's a rich problem where we should have a variety of strategies. And we only talked about one. I don't know if we want to talk about some other ways to solve that problem. But if we built on unit fraction. We talked about scaling. We just did this kind of commutative property swap the numerators thing. But also, we could have kids that say, "Well, I know one-fifth of five,-sixth, so I can double it to get two-fifths of five-sixths.

**Pam **18:54

What is one-fifth of five-sixths?

**Kim **18:56

One-fifth of five-sixths. So, one-fifth of 5 is 1. So, one-fifth of five-sixths is one-sixth.

**Pam **19:06

Nice. But we need two-fifths.

**Kim **19:09

So, it's two-sixths.

**Pam **19:10

So, you're going to double that to get two-sixths.

**Kim **19:12

Mmhm.

**Pam **19:12

I love it. Do you have any more? Put you on the spot.

**Kim **19:18

So, two-fifths of 5 is 2, so two-fifths of five-sixths is two-sixths.

**Pam **19:26

Nice. Well done. Yes?

**Kim **19:31

Well, I was going to say, and that's, you know, I think that's what we're hoping for in the classroom. That we don't just say let's, have meaning and all still do one way to solve a problem. You know, it's about building kids brains, so they can look at the numbers and see what they're playing with in that moment. Oh, this reminds me we had somebody in one of our Facebook groups. You know, we have we have a couple of different groups that we run. And one of the people said, "Hey, I have this question about my son, and he used to think about this multiplication fact this way, but lately I've noticed he's been thinking about it this way. Is that okay?" And I said that's absolutely brilliant that he used to... The last time she asked him how he thought about... I don't know. Maybe it was 8 times 4, he was thinking about it like 4 times 4 doubled. But now he's thinking about it like 10 times 4, back 2 times 4. And she's like, "Is that Is that okay?" I was like, "Yes, that's desirable! Yay, go him!"

**Pam **20:24

Yeah, we actually want multiple connections in kids heads, right? We want multiple ways, multiple paths, multiple representations. We want... It's not about... Oh, this is a high school thing. A lot of high school teachers will say multiple representations. And I'm like, ah, it's not about multiple representations. It's about the connections between multiple representations. We want to have a web-like series of connections in kids heads, so that they can use the one today that flows the easiest but also the one tomorrow that's going to connect to a different problem. Kim, I was just having a conversation yesterday with a mathematician at church. This guy, he makes me think. Oh, my gosh, every time we talk, I walk away going, "Let me think about that for a half and hour."

**Kim **21:08

That's awesome.

**Pam **21:09

So amazing. And his new project is he's working on a new encryption algorithm. Not encryption. He used to do encryption. Now, he's doing... Oh, golly, what do you call it when you make files smaller? Not condensing, but... Oh, my gosh, my brain. When you...

**Kim **21:27

No idea.

**Pam **21:29

Yeah, you know when you like take something, and you make it into a zip file, so that it... Compress! When you compress files. Okay, people are yelling at their. Yes, compressed files. I know. Anyway, so he's working on compression algorithms, and he was saying, "Hey, a lot of compression algorithms out there only work for certain kinds of files, and when you compress, it's pretty good if you can get like a 70% compression ratio." So, you know, if it was this big, now it's only 30% as big as it was. Then that's really good if you can compress it that much. But he's working on a compression algorithm that you can iteratively compress. So, you compress it, and then you can compress that one, and then you can compress that one. And we were starting to talk about. I kind of get a lot of what he was talking about. But I don't get how you uncompressed. Like, how do you not lose data when... Anyway, blah, blah, blah. What we were talking about was he said, "Yeah it's super important, that people..." He can't find people to work with, because he said people don't understand topology and number theory enough." And I said, "Hey, Al, I'm super curious. When you say that, would you agree with me that, it's a big reason, in a big way, people don't understand number theory because when they were actually doing numbers, they were taught to mimic and memorize, memorize and mimic algorithms." And he goes, "Yes! All they did was mimic and memorize algorithms, and so now that when they get to me, they never reasoned through the numbers, and so they're number theory is poor." And then add on to that they haven't had enough topology, and they can't put those together. The reason I'm mentioning this whole story is his brilliance in mathematics...like he has published a lot...is that he brings together these sort of disparate areas of mathematics. Like one of the reasons he could do what he does is because he brings together topology with things like set theory with things like number theory. And his unique way of bringing those connections together is where he adds to mathematics. I know I just got all excited about it. But that comes to mind because when you're mentioning this kid solving a problem in two different ways, it's about connecting. It's about connecting different ways of thinking. That's mathing. That's what mathematicians do. Now, Al, my friend does that with higher math. But we can do that very kind of thing with today. Today, we did it with fraction multiplication. Bam!

**Kim **23:49

Yeah. And it's why it's so important that we give kids so many experiences and bring all this stuff together because when they understand what a unit fraction is, and how to operate on it, and they own the commutative property, and the relationships between decimals, and fractions, and percents, they have choice, and they have really cool strategies at their fingertips.

**Pam **24:06

They have options. More importantly, they've built reasoning, and they are mathing.

**Kim **24:12

Yeah. Thanks for listening everyone, and for leaving us a review, and for sharing the Math is Figure-Out-Able movement alongside of us. We love doing this, and we want as many people to know that we are so grateful for you and this movement. Keep spreading the word.

**Pam **24:26

Bam! Thanks for tuning in and teaching more and more real math. To find out more about the Math is Figure-Out-Able movement, visit mathisfigureoutable.com. And keep spreading the word that Math is Figure-Out-Able.

×

All content © 2024 Math is Figure-Out-Able with Pam Harris.